Candidates should also refer to Faculty
Promotion and Tenure Dossier Format, OAA Memorandum No. 98.4, for specific
directions regarding outside evaluators, also addressed in the VPA P&T
Guidelines (Senate Document 97-21, section 3.1).
The most important decisions in the academic profession, for the individual and for the institution, regard the granting of tenure and the awarding of promotion. The granting of tenure involves a commitment on the part of the University for the working lifetime of the faculty member. Further, promotion may be granted before tenure. Consequently, the granting of tenure is a more serious decision than the award of promotion, as it has a significant impact on the faculty member, the University community, its students, and the citizens of the state.
With tenure a faculty member receives the opportunity to teach, study, and serve for the duration of his/her professional career in a community which protects academic freedom, provides adequate material rewards, and encourages intellectual growth. The university, for its part, benefits from the confident and disciplined pursuit of excellence undertaken by tenured faculty.
The decision to grant tenure, usually made at an early point in a colleague's career and/or after only a relatively short time has been spent at this university, must depend in part on what has been achieved in teaching, research, and service, and, to a greater degree, on what the candidate can reasonably be expected to achieve in these areas in the future. Those responsible for recommendations and decisions regarding tenure must also pay due regard to the mission of the candidate's unit and her/his contribution to it.
The granting of tenure then results from positive university action rather than a legal obligation or a reward; tenure can be acquired only as a result of positive action. In contrast to tenure, promotion in rank is more heavily dependent upon evidence of professional achievement. Considerations of promise of continued development and the candidate's contribution to the particular mission of her/his unit are also important, but less crucial. The application of criteria in promotion decisions provides evidence of the university's values and the seriousness with which they are applied. Promotions measure, reward, and inspire accomplishment.
Back to Document
Table of Contents
1.11. a record of satisfactory achievement in teaching, research, and service as determined by departmental criteria;
1.12. (for the award of tenure at the rank of assistant professor) the likelihood of promotion to higher rank in the near future; and
1.13. the unusual importance of the individual's contribution to the university, the demonstrated support of the stated missions of the department, school and university, and professional and respectful conduct toward colleagues and students as specified in the school and university handbooks.
1.2 Cases for tenure in these exceptional circumstances must address each of these points.
Back to Document
Table of Contents
2.1 Teaching
A candidate who excels in teaching
is one who guides and inspires students and stimulates their
intellectual interest and enthusiasm; one who displays a spirit of scholarly
inquiry which leads him/her to develop and strengthen courses content in
the light of developments in the field, as well as to improve methods of
presenting material. Such a faculty member keeps informed about new
developments in his or her area of expertise and strives continually to
broaden and deepen his or her knowledge and understanding.
2.11 An outstanding teacher continually contributes to improving methods of teaching his or her subject matter. Indicators of excellence in teaching could include scholarly relationships with students, creativity in the classroom, opportunities provided to students for independent study, results of standardized classroom achievement tests, or pre-course -- post-course assessment. Other important contributions to excellence in teaching may included, but are not limited to, curriculum development, development or use of instructional technology, teaching of various sizes and levels of classes, graduate program involvement, thesis direction, independent project direction, or influence as a teacher that extends beyond the local area, usually through publications, lectures, workshops, and other appropriate activities.
2.12 The evaluation of teaching shall include written evaluations by the chairperson and course evaluations by students. Other forms of documentation may include, but are not limited to, self-evaluation, evaluation of syllabi and teaching methods and materials, audio visual tapes of teaching, exit interviews, alumni evaluation, peer evaluation, record of student accomplishments, outside professional evaluation, and unsolicited communications.
2.2 Research,
Scholarship, and/or Creative Endeavor
2.21 A candidate who excels in research
is involved in scholarly or creative endeavor appropriate to the candidate's
discipline. The results of the research should have been evaluated by authorities
in the field. Distinguished creative work appropriate to the area of specialization
is carried out and the results are disseminated by exhibition, performance,
publication or other appropriate methods. Expectations are for work off-campus
in northeast Indiana, and/or at the state, regional, or national level
appropriate to the rank and according to departmental guidelines.
2.22 Specific arrangements should be made according to campus and department guidelines for external evaluation of representative creative work, published materials, performance, lectures, works of art, or creative writing. Level of competence or excellence for each case will be indicated in accordance with department and campus guidelines. Procedures and expectations for obtaining at least three external letters of review addressing research/creative endeavor are specified in section 3.1 of this document.
2.23 Other evidence may be included, such as peer evaluation of creative endeavor or written public response to creative endeavor.
2.3 Service
2.31 A candidate who excels in service
contributes in one or more of the following areas: Institutional service,
professional service to the community, or service to the profession. The
evaluation of service should be supported by evidence drawn from various
sources.
2.32 To establish competence in service, a faculty member should have participated in appropriate activities and necessary committee work of the department, the College of Visual and Performing Arts, and the university in accordance with department and campus guidelines.
2.33 A faculty member may excel in institutional service or professional service. Excellence may be achieved by the display of leadership in academic and other university affairs. A significant contribution may be made as an officer of a professional, technical, or scholarly society in northeast Indiana, and/or at the state, regional, or national level appropriate to the rank and according to departmental guidelines.
2.4 Application
of Criteria to Different Ranks
2.41 When considered for promotion, the
individual should be assessed in light of all three criteria from sections
2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 above. Favorable action shall result when the individual
has demonstrated, in one area of endeavor, a level of excellence appropriate
to the proposed rank. Failure to promote may arise, however, from unsatisfactory
performance in the other areas.
2.42 Promotion to Assistant Professor
Promotion to Assistant Professor is based
upon a strong academic record, and the individual should have in most cases
completed a terminal degree. There should be clear indications that the
individual possesses those qualities which will eventually assure promotion
to the rank of Associate Professor.
2.43 Promotion from Assistant Professor
to Associate Professor
Promotion to Associate Professor is based
upon actual performance and the potential for continued professional growth.
Criteria are based upon department promotion documents and must reflect
state and/or regional recognition.
2.44 Promotion from Associate Professor
to Professor
Promotion to Professor is awarded to individuals
recognized by professional peers as authorities in their fields. It is
expected that candidates will have made important and recognized contributions
in at least one of the areas: teaching, research and service. Candidates
will be recognized and respected in state, regional, or national educational
and professional circles. Criteria are based upon department promotion
documents and must reflect national recognition.
Back to Document
Table of Contents
Development of the Case
Each candidate must prepare a case document
for Promotion or Tenure in accordance with The
Faculty Promotion and Tenure Dossier Format, Office of Academic Affairs
Memorandum No. 93-1, April 1994 (supersedes OAA Memorandum 89-2), or subsequent
revision. In tenure and/or promotion cases wherein tenure and/or promotion
is awarded at IPFW, the dossiers shall be prepared according to IPFW guidelines
and considered according to IPFW criteria, policies and practices.
3.1 External Review Letters
3.11 Evaluations: Each promotion or tenure
dossier shall include letters of reference secured for the occasion from
individuals external to the campus. A minimum of three letters should address
research/creative endeavor. Additional evaluations should address teaching
or service if one of these is the candidate's proposed area of excellence.
A minimum of three letters should address the proposed area of excellence.
Evaluators with the knowledge to assess multiple areas may do so.
3.12 Evaluators: The outside evaluators shall have the knowledge and distinction sufficient to create an informed and trustworthy assessment.
3.13 Materials to be evaluated: The candidate shall identify the materials to be submitted to outside evaluation. Materials related to research and creative endeavor may include published and unpublished matter, refereed or not, and are to be so identified. Reasonable procedural adaptations will be made for candidates whose creative endeavor is of an ephemeral or participatory nature.
To inform the evaluator, these materials must be accompanied by the candidate's current curriculum vitae and a statement of the applicable department, division, and school criteria.
In a tenure dossier, materials may have been completed before and during the probational period at IPFW.
In a promotion dossier, the materials must have been completed during the period since any previous IPFW promotion.
Materials may include work completed previous to employment at IPFW to demonstrate growth, breadth and depth of research/creative endeavor.
3.14 Selecting the outside evaluators: The candidate shall submit to the department chair a written list of evaluator's names including information about their positions and any prior association. The chair, in consultation with the dean, will provide names of additional evaluators. The candidate and the chair shall agree upon the list of potential evaluators to which invitations will be sent. The above process will be repeated until at least three evaluators are chosen, approved by the dean, and agree to serve.
3.15 Securing the evaluations: The chair shall send each evaluator a standard letter specifying that the evaluator's identity cannot be kept confidential, and including the candidate's curriculum vitae. Upon receiving agreement of the evaluator to serve, the chair shall send the materials to be evaluated.
3.16 Using the evaluations: As the outside evaluations are received, the chair shall provide them to the candidate for inclusion in the dossier.
3.17 Information to be included in the external review section of the case:
3.171 The relationship between the candidate and the person writing the external letters shall be explicit and clear (friends, colleagues, former dissertation advisor, etc.).
3.172 The qualifications of the external reviewer shall be specified. What makes this person qualified to render an opinion on the scholarly/creative work of the candidate?
3.173 The manner in which the external reviewers were selected and the relationship, if any, of the reviewer to the candidate shall be clearly stated. They shall be solicited by the chair after consultation with the candidate and approved by the dean.
3.174 A copy of the actual solicitation letter shall be included in the case to clarify what the external reviewer was asked to do and the criteria applied.
3.2 Recommendations and Additional Procedures
Complete format is available from the Office of Academic Affairs Memo No. 93.1, April 1994. See the addendum of the School document for additional information.
3.21 Please see Office of Academic Affairs Memo No. 93.1, April 1994 for additional recommendations.
Back to Document
Table of Contents
4.1 Submission of the Case
All cases for promotion and tenure shall
be forwarded to the Department Committee by the stipulated date.
4.2 Individual Participation
4.21 No person shall serve as a voting member of any committee during an academic year in which his or her nomination for promotion or tenure is under consideration, nor shall any individual make a recommendation on his or her own promotion or tenure nomination.
4.22 The department/program level excepted, no individual shall serve in a voting or recommending role at more than one decision level. In order that this be accomplished, the campus committee shall be filled before school/division committees. In the event that the chief academic officer of a department, program, school, or division serves as ex-officio members of a committee, then that person shall not vote during that committee's deliberations and decisions.
4.3 The administrator or committee chair at each level shall inform the candidate in writing of the vote or recommendation on the nomination, with a clear and complete statement of the reasons. Therefor, at the time the case is sent forward to the next level. the administrator or committee chair shall also send a copy of the recommendation and statements of reasons to the previous level(s). The candidate has the opportunity to provide written response at all levels within the school which will be forwarded with the case.
4.4 The deliberations of committees at all levels shall be strictly confidential, and only the chair may communicate a committee's decision to the candidate and to the next level. Within the confidential discussions of the committees, each member's vote on a case shall be openly declared.
4.5 The department/program committee, whose composition and functions shall be established according to a procedure adopted by the faculty of the department/program and approved by the faculty of the school/division. The Senate shall have the right to review of this procedure. The department/program committee shall follow procedures established by the faculty of the school/division or, in the absence of such procedures, by the Senate.
4.51 In establishing their committees, departments should be guided by two principles: that all full-time tenure-track members of the department should be consulted about each case for promotion and tenure: and that those persons possessing the same or higher rank or the status to which a candidate aspires should have major responsibilities in formulating the department's recommendations, where possible.
4.52 The appointment letter of a faculty member to more than one academic unit shall identify that department/program whose tenure/promotion process shall apply to the appointee.
4.53 The Department Committee shall conduct an open ballot on each promotion case and on each tenure case. A simple majority of the ballots cast shall constitute a positive recommendation by the committee. The committee chair shall record the result of the balloting and append it to the case. The department chairperson shall recommend or not recommend the candidate. Within five instructional days of the vote, and before the case is forwarded to the School Committee, the department chairperson shall advise the nominee in writing of the outcome of the balloting and of the chairperson's recommendation. The only cases which may not be withdrawn at this time are tenure cases in the penultimate year. The remaining cases shall be forwarded to the School Committee.
4.54 The candidate may be offered the opportunity to revise or edit the document before the committee's final review and submission to the school committee.
4.55 The candidate has the opportunity to provide written response to the committee's final review which will be forwarded with the case.
4.6 The chief academic officer of the department/program (the department chair)
4.7 The school/division committee(s), established by the school/division faculty, incorporated into the documents which define the procedures of faculty governance within the school/division, and approved by the Senate. This procedure shall be periodically published, simultaneously with the Bylaws of the Senate, as and when the Bylaws of the Senate are distributed.
4.71 Nothing in this document shall be construed as requiring a school or division without departments to perform a second review and make a second recommendation on promotion and tenure cases; however, when such a review and recommendation are made by a committee, the committee shall be constituted in such a way that a majority of its voting members will not have served on the first committee.
4.72 The members of the School Committee shall be elected by the voting faculty of the College of Visual and Performing Arts according to procedures established by that faculty as articulated in VPA "Governance Document," 93-1, revised 5/96. At least one-half of the membership of the School Committee shall consist of faculty without administrative appointment. The committee shall elect a chair from the voting faculty members. The Dean of the College of Visual and Performing Arts shall serve ex-officio, without vote, except when the committee is considering that person's candidacy for tenure or promotion. Department chairs may not serve in the years when cases from their respective departments are being presented, except in such case as the eligible voting members in that department be too few, in which case the chair could serve at the specific request of the department.
4.73 The School Committee shall conduct an open ballot on each promotion case and on each tenure case. A simple majority of the ballots cast shall constitute a positive recommendation by the committee. The chair of the committee shall record the results of the balloting and the recommendation and append them to the case. A written summary supporting the vote shall be drafted and approved by the voting members of the committee. Within 5 working days after the close of the committee business, the recommendations and summary of the committee must be forwarded to the nominee, the department chair, the department committee chair, and with the case to the Dean.
4.74 The candidate may be offered the opportunity to revise or edit the document before the committee's final review and submission to the university committee.
4.75 The candidate has the opportunity to provide written response to the committee's final review which will be forwarded with the case.
4.8 The chief academic officer of the school/division
(the
dean of fine and performing arts).
The Dean shall forward a written recommendation
and summary to the nominee, the department chair, and the department committee
chair no less than five working days before the university deadline for
receipt of the case. The only cases which may not be withdrawn at this
time are tenure cases in the penultimate year. The remaining promotion
and tenure cases shall be forwarded to the appropriate campus committee.
4.81 The candidate may be offered the opportunity to revise or edit the document before the dean's final review and submission to the university committee.
4.82 The candidate has the opportunity to provide written response to the dean's final review which will be forwarded with the case.
4.9 The campus committee, consisting of the Chief Academic Officer of IPFW as nonvoting chair and seven tenured members of the Fort Wayne Faculty, a majority of whom hold the rank of Professor or Librarian, selected so as to provide balanced representation of the disciplinary areas. Voting members of this committee shall be elected to three-year terms, staggered in the first instance, by the chief Administrative Officer of IPFW and the two Speakers of the Faculty. The committee members will be elected from a panel of nominees composed of at least two representatives from the faculty of each school/division selected according to procedures adopted by the school/division Faculty and incorporated into the documents which define the protocols of Faculty governance within the school/division. Voting members of this committee shall recuse themselves from considering cases of candidates with whom they share significant credit for research or creative endeavors which is part of the candidate's case. Faculty members shall not serve on this committee in a year when their own cases are pending. The purposes of this committee are to review the actions of the earlier decision levels to assure that the candidate is afforded basic fairness and due process in accordance with established university policies and procedures and to assess the adequacy and sufficiency of the evidence. The direct submission to members of materials which are not part of the promotion and/or tenure case dossier is prohibited.
4.91 The Faculty Affairs committee shall conduct a faculty election for three nominees to serve on the campus committee. The slate of candidates will be selected from among tenured faculty of the school. The names of three nominees will be forwarded to the chief administrative officer by the chair of the Faculty Affairs Committee.
4.10 The chief academic officer of IPFW
4.11 The chief administrative officer of IPFW, to forward recommendations to the President of Indiana University and to the President of Purdue University.
Back to Document
Table of Contents
Back to the VPA Faculty Handbook Main Page
1.1 Recommendations from former VCAA (3.12)
The single most critical area examined
by the committees is the quality and quantity of research/scholarship/creative
endeavor. More candidates are unsuccessful on the research/scholarship/creative
endeavor criterion than any other, even if the candidate is simply trying
to demonstrate "competence" as opposed to "excellence." Candidates should
carefully review their departmental definitions of research/creative endeavor.
1.2 Citation of Accomplishment of Scholarly/Creative Endeavor
1.21 Articles cited from refereed journals shall be clearly indicated
1.22 Acceptance or rejection rates from these journals shall be indicated.
1.3 Alumni Feedback
1.31 If alumni have been solicited, the manner of that solicitation shall be stated.
1.32 The number of letters sent out and the number received shall be stated.
Back to Document
Table of Contents
To ensure consistency and fairness in determining which conditions are sufficiently justifiable to warrant deviation from the tenure policy, the following guidelines and procedures are recommended:
Guidelines:
1. Ordinarily, an individual may exclude
no more than one year from the probationary period for justifiable conditions.
2. Normally, requests for exclusions must be made within one year from the time the conditions occurred which precipitated the request.
3. Exclusions will not be granted after the beginning of the penultimate year.
4. Decisions regarding whether or not requests for exclusions will be granted shall be based on:
6. Work accomplished during the excluded period may be cited in the promotion/tenure case.
Procedures
1. Requests for exclusion shall be
made in writing by the faculty member to the Department Chair. The Chair
will determine, in consultation with the Departmental Promotion and Tenure
Committee, whether the request is justifiable and forward a recommendation
through the Dean to the Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs. The Vice
Chancellor for Academic Affairs, in consultation with the faculty's Department
Chair and Dean, will have the authority to approve exclusions for justifiable
conditions.
2. Requests for exclusions may be made at any time during each academic year up until March 15 of the academic year prior to the penultimate year. Decisions regarding requests will be made within 60 days of the receipt of the request.
3. Any faculty member who feels it necessary
to appeal a decision made under the above guidelines and procedures may
utilize the grievance procedures established for academic personnel.
Back to Document
Table of Contents
Back to the VPA Faculty Handbook Main Page